The Tweet I quoted in class gave the wrong name of the case. Here is the correct info.
"Issue: Whether the First Amendment allows a government
regulator to threaten regulated entities with adverse regulatory actions
if they do business with a controversial speaker, as a consequence of
(a) the government’s own hostility to the speaker’s viewpoint or (b) a
perceived “general backlash” against the speaker’s advocacy." Here is a NYT article on the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment