I had a nice conversation after class yesterday about Justice Rehnquist's dissent concerning the reach of the no-compelled-speech doctrine. Here is what Rehnquist argued:
"The logic of the Court's opinion leads to startling, and I believe totally unacceptable, results. For example, the mottoes "In God We Trust" and "E Pluribus Unum" appear on the coin and currency of the United States. I cannot imagine that the statutes, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 331 and 333, proscribing defacement of United States currency impinge upon the First Amendment rights of an atheist. The fact that an atheist carries and uses United States currency does not, in any meaningful sense, convey any affirmation of belief on his part in the motto "In God We Trust." Similarly, there is no affirmation of belief involved in the display of state license tags upon the private automobiles involved here."
What do you think? Does the printing of In God We Trust on our money make mobile billboards of us all?
No comments:
Post a Comment