On page one of our linked opinion, Justice Ginsburg says this: "CLS, it bears emphasis, seeks not parity with other organizations, but a preferential exemption from Hastings' policy."
Is this information? Or disinformation?
If CLS had prevailed on its free speech/expressive association claims, would those rights belong only to CLS? Or would every other student organization have the exact same rights under the Free Speech Clause as CLS?
No comments:
Post a Comment