1. Dobbs seems consistent with an original meaning interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment. But could a pro-life proponent of the Living Constitutuion have reached the same results? How so?
2. Considering the two opposing views of Dobbs I posted on the blog--link--is it possible for a deeply divided Nation such as ours to live under the Constitution? One side or the other will always believe that the existing Constitution is illegitimate and a "threat to democracy." How can a house divided against itself survive? What, if anything, can be done to help us live peaceably together with such inconsistent views of what is good and what is evil?
