1. Dobbs seems consistent with an original meaning interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment. But could a pro-life proponent of the Living Constitutuion have reached the same results? How so?
2. Considering the two opposing views of Dobbs I posted on the blog--link--is it possible for a deeply divided Nation such as ours to live under the Constitution? One side or the other will always believe that the existing Constitution is illegitimate and a "threat to democracy." How can a house divided against itself survive? What, if anything, can be done to help us live peaceably together with such inconsistent views of what is good and what is evil?
No comments:
Post a Comment