He called for "diversity of education" and parental choice. He said rather than provide education in government schools, Government "might leave to parents to obtain the education where and how they pleased, and content itself with helping to pay the school fees of the poorer classes of children, and defraying the entire school expenses of those who have no one else to pay for them." (Id.)
In our society, the problem is not so much government schools, which
serve the needs of many families who prefer a secular progressive education, but the government school monopoly. The school funding monopoly favors parents who prefer the secular viewpoints taught in government schools and strongly disfavors dissenting parents who wish their children to be taught from religious or competing secular points of view. Realistically, because most dissenting parents cannot afford to educate their children outside the public school system, the funding monopoly results in creating a captive audience of impressionable children to have their minds molded by the preferred viewpoints of government officials who control the strictly secular public school curriculum.
Freedom of thought and freedom of belief cannot exist in a State that effectively requires all but the wealthy to send their children to government schools. As Mill said, it results in a "despotism over the mind."
No comments:
Post a Comment