Is Washington's exclusion of "devotional theology" majors from an otherwise generally available scholarship program unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination under Rosenberger?
The Court (edited: note 3) says that a scholarship program is "not a forum for speech." In other words, it is just a program funding a product, not one designed "to encourage a diversity of views from private speakers." Do you agree?
Suppose the scholarship program could be used to pursue any major except a major in "feminist gender studies" or "Keynesian economics" or "political science from a socialist perspective?"
-
Monday August 28 : Handout on Moore v Harper (PDF has been emailed to you); Originalism vs. the "Living Constitution": Strau...
-
I. Tinker A student's right to speak (even on controversial subjects such as war) in the cafeteria, the playing field, or "on the...
-
"Studying the Constitution has some of the same intellectual delight as reading Aristotle: it opens the mind on a subject of fi...
No comments:
Post a Comment