Is Washington's exclusion of "devotional theology" majors from an otherwise generally available scholarship program unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination under Rosenberger?
The Court (edited: note 3) says that a scholarship program is "not a forum for speech." In other words, it is just a program funding a product, not one designed "to encourage a diversity of views from private speakers." Do you agree?
Suppose the scholarship program could be used to pursue any major except a major in "feminist gender studies" or "Keynesian economics" or "political science from a socialist perspective?"
No comments:
Post a Comment