Under the Lemon test, government may not advance or inhibit religion.
If we take this test seriously, and apply the no inhibition rule with the same enthusiasm as the no advancement rule, where would we end up?
What kinds of governmental laws, activities, and policies have the effect of inhibiting religion?
What are your thoughts?
-
Monday August 28 : Handout on Moore v Harper (PDF has been emailed to you); Originalism vs. the "Living Constitution": Strau...
-
I. Tinker A student's right to speak (even on controversial subjects such as war) in the cafeteria, the playing field, or "on the...
-
"Studying the Constitution has some of the same intellectual delight as reading Aristotle: it opens the mind on a subject of fi...
No comments:
Post a Comment