As
the plurality indicates in Roemer, the court seems to have
imposed two requirements (casebook p. 1852):
1) no aid to institutions that are
“pervasively sectarian” i.e. institutions that are too religious
(secular activities cannot be separated from sectarian ones)
2) only secular activities can be funded
For
example, in Hunt (p. 1850), the court upheld public financing of dining hall
facilities at a non-pervasively sectarian Baptist College. Suppose instead of a luke-warm, kinda sorta
Baptist College, the funds were to be used to finance a dining hall at an on-fire
Baptist College such as Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University.What is the difference between the respective dining halls of the two schools?
No comments:
Post a Comment