Was the problem for the court in Poway that the banned t-shirt used the word "shameful?" Suppose instead pro-family students wore t-shirts on National Day of Truth proclaiming:
"THE TRUTH SHALL NOT BE SILENCED"
"ONE MAN ONE WOMAN ONE FAMILY"
Would a t-shirt such as this have passed muster under the 9th Circuit's reading of Tinker?
Suppose in, say, Kansas a public school student is disciplined for wearing a t-shirt on the National Day of Silence proclaiming:
"HOMOPHOBIA IS SHAMEFUL"
Could this shirt be banned under Poway due to disruptions that occurred at last year's Day of Silence? Would it matter if the school banned the anti-homophobia t-shirts while permitting students to wear pro-family t-shirts such as the one in the first hypo above?
Let's talk about these issues in today's class!
The web log for Prof. Duncan's Constitutional Law Classes at Nebraska Law-- "[U]nder our Constitution there can be no such thing as either a creditor or a debtor race. That concept is alien to the Constitution's focus upon the individual. In the eyes of government, we are just one race here. It is American. " -----Justice Antonin Scalia If you allow the government to take your liberty during times of crisis, it will create a crisis whenever it wishes to take your liberty.
Friday, August 04, 2006
-
I. Tinker A student's right to speak (even on controversial subjects such as war) in the cafeteria, the playing field, or "on the...
-
Monday August 28 : Handout on Moore v Harper (PDF has been emailed to you); Originalism vs. the "Living Constitution": Strau...
-
Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cakeshop (art by Joshua Duncan) "We may not shelter in place when the C...
No comments:
Post a Comment