Monday, January 28, 2008

Interesting Free Exercise Issue:"dispute between divorced parents over whether their 12-year old son could receive a religious circumcision"

Religion Clause blog. Here is an excerpt:



"An important issue remained undecided after the Oregon Supreme Court on Friday sent back to the trial court for further findings the dispute between divorced parents over whether their 12-year old son could receive a religious circumcision. As previously reported, in Boldt v. Boldt, the Oregon Supreme Court remanded the case for further findings on whether or not the boy wanted the procedure. The court's decision only tangentially addressed a critical issue-- to what extent do minor children have free exercise rights when their religious views conflict with those their parents wish them to hold?"

No comments: