How should the Constitution apply to a case like that of the religious students who refused to read Studs Terkels' excellent, but raw book, Working? Should the school be required under the First Amendment to allow the dissenters to read a substitute book? Or should the courts leave this decision to school authorities and the school board (and ultimately to the political process)?
If you were a school district attorney, what would you advise your client to do? Why?
-
Monday August 28 : Handout on Moore v Harper (PDF has been emailed to you); Originalism vs. the "Living Constitution": Strau...
-
I. Tinker A student's right to speak (even on controversial subjects such as war) in the cafeteria, the playing field, or "on the...
-
"Studying the Constitution has some of the same intellectual delight as reading Aristotle: it opens the mind on a subject of fi...
No comments:
Post a Comment