Police investigating Christian activist for hate crimes
Last Updated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:52:47 EDT
CBC NEWS
Two thousand leaflets attacking gays and lesbians have put a Christian activist in western Canada under investigation by Edmonton police for hate crimes.
The flyers by Bill Whatcott of Regina refer to gay marriage as "sodomite marriage" and use graphic language to describe the alleged sex practices of homosexuals.
The handouts also used derogatory terms to describe federal Defence Minister Bill Graham.
Whatcott stuffed his pamphlets into mailboxes in the riding of Deputy Prime Minister Anne McLellan, and some recipients complained to police.
"The material is offensive and it's an affront on the basic tenets of our society, which is about multiculturalism, tolerance and peaceful co-existence," Const. Steve Camp, of the Edmonton police hate crimes unit, said.
The Pride Centre of Edmonton said it would take the case to the Alberta Human Rights and Citizenship Commission if no criminal charges arise from the police investigation.
Whatcott has led protests across Saskatchewan and Alberta against abortion and gays.
He says he was a gay prostitute until age 18 to pay for a drug habit, then became leader of a small group called the Christian Truth Activists.
Last month, the Saskatchewan Human Rights Tribunal fined Whatcott $17,500 for handing out similar material.
But he has refused to pay the fine, calling the tribunal a "kangaroo court."
Whatcott doesn't sidestep responsibility – he prints his name and telephone number on his material – and he says he's had at least 50 angry callers.
But he says he won't stop because he has a right to free speech.
He told opponents: "Tough, you live in a democracy."Query: If "peaceful co-existence" is one of Canada's basic values, shouldn't the law permit speech from all points of view on issues of public concern (such as gay rights and same-sex marriage)?
Or should the violence of the law be employed against some groups that engage in peaceful expressive activities that other groups find offensive?
Do these kinds of "hate speech" laws codify intolerance in the name of tolerance? In other words, do these laws effectively say "everyone must tolerate everyone else, and if you disagree and say something critical about someone else, you will go to jail, you miserable, Bible-thumping cretin"?
Is Canada truly a "tolerant" country that respects "diversity" and pluralism? Or does it merely tolerate certain subgroups (those it likes) while suppressing others (those it dislikes)?
The web log for Prof. Duncan's Constitutional Law Classes at Nebraska Law-- "[U]nder our Constitution there can be no such thing as either a creditor or a debtor race. That concept is alien to the Constitution's focus upon the individual. In the eyes of government, we are just one race here. It is American. " -----Justice Antonin Scalia If you allow the government to take your liberty during times of crisis, it will create a crisis whenever it wishes to take your liberty.
Thursday, June 09, 2005
No (Free Speech in) Canada
The CBC has this report about "hate speech" laws in Canada.
-
I. Tinker A student's right to speak (even on controversial subjects such as war) in the cafeteria, the playing field, or "on the...
-
Monday August 28 : Handout on Moore v Harper (PDF has been emailed to you); Originalism vs. the "Living Constitution": Strau...
-
Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cakeshop (art by Joshua Duncan) "We may not shelter in place when the C...
No comments:
Post a Comment