Once we are dealing with symbolic acts, O’Brien gives us a four-part test for determining when a government interest in regulating the nonspeech element sufficiently justifies the regulation of expressive conduct:
The government regulation of expressive conduct is valid if:
1) it is within the Constitutional power of government [raising an army]
2) furthers an important or substantial interest [preventing harm to the smooth and efficient functioning of the Selective Service System]
3) if the governmental interest is unrelated to the suppression of free expression; and
4) if the incidental restriction on free expression is no greater than is essential to the furtherance of that interest.
By the way, notice how the Court totally rejects a "purpose" test under the Free Speech Clause. The Court's objections here (p.1510) are basically the same as Justice Scalia's objections to a "purpose" test under the Establishment Clause. Notice that, somehow, the EC seems to be an exception to every normal rule the Court applies to every other constitutional claim--standing, incorporation, purpose, government speech, etc. Where in the text of the Constitution is this special status for the EC?
The web log for Prof. Duncan's Constitutional Law Classes at Nebraska Law-- "[U]nder our Constitution there can be no such thing as either a creditor or a debtor race. That concept is alien to the Constitution's focus upon the individual. In the eyes of government, we are just one race here. It is American. " -----Justice Antonin Scalia If you allow the government to take your liberty during times of crisis, it will create a crisis whenever it wishes to take your liberty.
-
Monday August 28 : Handout on Moore v Harper (PDF has been emailed to you); Originalism vs. the "Living Constitution": Strau...
-
I. Tinker A student's right to speak (even on controversial subjects such as war) in the cafeteria, the playing field, or "on the...
-
"Studying the Constitution has some of the same intellectual delight as reading Aristotle: it opens the mind on a subject of fi...
No comments:
Post a Comment